Hey phantom gnu poster. Are you true gnu or are you imitation? I thought
the original bourne shell was proprietary. And of course we know all
the gnu tools are better than their predecessors. So, wouldn't you
tend to support bash? Isn't bash gnu's answer to the features everyone
liked in sh and everything everyone wish is it had? Isn't that
why it was bourne again?
Are you the real gnu linux, or are you an imposter?
brian
On Fri, Oct 08, 1999 at 11:40:56PM -0700, Linux Rocks wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 08, 1999 at 03:05:12PM -0700, Sean-Paul Rees wrote:
> > No. bash (your head in against the wall) blows chunks. Real UNIX admins
> > use tcsh or zsh, everything else is sub-par.
>
> tcsh is an improved csh, but why not just use a full featured shell like
> bash?
>
> zsh is good if you want to be different. Lots of features, but bash has
> more features than I need.
>
> Real UNIX admins use the bourne shell!!!
-- Brian Lavender http://www.brie.com/brian/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Fri Feb 25 2000 - 14:29:07 PST